Model page

zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash warn

downloads 2.0Mlikes 1.8klicense mitarch glm4_moe_liteparams 31221.5Mupdated 2026-01-29

chat template: present · view on Hugging Face ↗

Scan coverage

Ingot runs three batteries against a model. What each one checks →

BatteryLooks atStatus
Static batteryMetadata & packagingcomplete 2026-08-22
Weights batteryWeights forensics — no GPU, no downloadcomplete 2026-08-22154,880-token embedding scanned · 1003 undertrained
Behavioral batteryLive-inference differentialsnot run

Findings

Scanned 2026-08-22 · published from a community scan.

medium Undertrained (glitch) token surface in vocabulary

Embedding-norm scan flagged 1003 undertrained tokens (norm < 0.3× the vocabulary median of 0.774), including 122 plain-ASCII strings that can appear in ordinary input as identifiers — e.g. "$PostalCodesNL", "_typeDefinitionSize", "_ComCallableWrapper", "ForCanBeConvertedToF", "PostalCodesNL", "ForCanBeConverted", "estattet", "irsiniz". In models where this class was tested behaviorally, such tokens silently rewrote user input into confident, schema-valid, wrong output. These are candidates from the weights alone; behavioral confirmation requires the behavioral battery.

How to fixruntime guardweight-level

Keep the affected token strings out of the model's input — the scan-derived runtime guard carries this model's exact blocklist.

  1. Fetch this model's guard artifact (`/api/v1/guard/<owner>/<model>`): the confirmed corrupting tokens and the low-norm candidate list, derived from the published scan.
  2. Screen inbound text with it (the `@ingotai/guard` package is a reference implementation) and route flagged records to a different model or human review — verbatim-copy tasks on flagged strings are the failure mode.
  3. The underlying cause is undertrained embeddings in the weights; a true fix is weight-level (continued pretraining on the affected tokens) — that is not a patch, it's a training job.

Remediation guidance addresses the documented findings only. It is evidence-driven repair, not a safety certification of the model.

Fingerprint

The durable profile of this model: measured weights-and-metadata facts, rebuilt on every scan and battery run. Updated 2026-08-22.

architectureglm4_moe_lite · 47 layers · 2048-dim
parameters31221.5M
vocabulary154,880 tokens
licensemit
serializationsafetensors
chat templatenone
glitch-token surface1,003 undertrained candidates, 122 plain-ASCII
Full measured fingerprint
architecturesGlm4MoeLiteForCausalLM
librarytransformers
pipelinetext-generation
repo files58
revision7dd20894a642
HF snapshot2.0M downloads · 1.8k likes · updated 2026-01-29 · captured 2026-08-21
embedding tensormodel.embed_tokens.weight · BF16 · 154,880×2048
embedding normsmedian 0.7745 · mean 0.7555
lineage checkno claimed base model
glitch-token samples"$PostalCodesNL", "_typeDefinitionSize", "_ComCallableWrapper", "ForCanBeConvertedToF", "PostalCodesNL", "ForCanBeConverted", "estattet", "irsiniz", "ociazione", "unehmen", "_FieldOffsetTable", "_AdjustorThunk"

Battery runs

The run trace behind the findings above: every deep-battery job for this model, with what each run measured or why it failed. Findings are only as good as the runs that produced them.

batterystatusqueueddurationattempts
weightscomplete2026-08-21 07:4223s1
weights run 2026-08-21 measurements
probes runglitch-norm-scan, lineage-norm-correlation
embedding tensormodel.embed_tokens.weight · BF16 · 154,880×2048
glitch surface1,003 undertrained, 122 plain-ASCII
lineage checknot checked (no claimed base model)

Verdict badge

Ship the verdict in your README — it always shows the latest published analysis:

Ingot verdict: warn

[![Ingot scan](https://ingot.tools/api/v1/models/zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash/badge.svg)](https://ingot.tools/models/zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash)
Gate it in CI