Model page

openai/gpt-oss-120b pass

No major issues. Minor: a small glitch-token surface (non-English text only).

downloads 4.5Mlikes 5.3klicense apache-2.0arch gpt_ossparams 116829.2Mupdated 2025-08-26

chat template: present · view on Hugging Face ↗

Scan coverageStatic battery2026-08-22Weights battery2026-08-20Behavioral batterynot rundetails
BatteryLooks atStatus
Static batteryMetadata & packagingcomplete 2026-08-22
Weights batteryWeights forensics: no GPU, no downloadcomplete 2026-08-20201,088-token embedding scanned · 936 undertrained
Behavioral batteryLive-inference differentialsnot run

Ingot runs three batteries against a model. What each one checks →

Findings

Scanned 2026-08-22 · published from a community scan.

low Undertrained tokens in vocabulary (non-ASCII tail)

Embedding-norm scan flagged 936 undertrained tokens (norm < 0.3× the vocabulary median), but 0 decode to plain-ASCII strings, so exposure in English-language pipelines is limited. Behavioral confirmation requires the behavioral battery.

How to fixruntime guardweight-level

Keep the affected token strings out of the model's input — the scan-derived runtime guard carries this model's exact blocklist.

  1. Fetch this model's guard artifact (`/api/v1/guard/<owner>/<model>`): the confirmed corrupting tokens and the low-norm candidate list, derived from the published scan.
  2. Screen inbound text with it (the `@ingotai/guard` package is a reference implementation) and route flagged records to a different model or human review — verbatim-copy tasks on flagged strings are the failure mode.
  3. The underlying cause is undertrained embeddings in the weights; a true fix is weight-level (continued pretraining on the affected tokens) — that is not a patch, it's a training job.

info Glitch-token echo probe: no candidate surface

Embedding-norm scan found no undertrained ASCII tokens (threshold 28.2629 vs vocab median 94.2097), so the glitch-token data-corruption class has nothing to trigger on. Echo probe not applicable.

Remediation guidance addresses the documented findings only. It is evidence-driven repair, not a safety certification of the model.

Put this result in your workflow

Check every checkpoint before it ships

Use the web app, API, CLI, or CI gate to scan candidate checkpoints and catch model drift before deployment. Public-model scans publish to the open database; paid plans add the volume needed for continuous checks.

Fingerprint

The durable profile of this model: measured weights-and-metadata facts, rebuilt on every scan and battery run. Updated 2026-08-20.

architecturegpt_oss · 36 layers · 2880-dim
parameters116829.2M
vocabulary201,088 tokens
licenseapache-2.0
serializationsafetensors pickle
chat templatenone
glitch-token surface936 undertrained candidates, 0 plain-ASCII
Full measured fingerprint
architecturesGptOssForCausalLM
librarytransformers
pipelinetext-generation
repo files37 — pickle: metal/model.bin
revisionb5c939de8f75
HF snapshot4.7M downloads · 5.1k likes · updated 2025-08-26 · captured 2026-08-20
embedding tensormodel.embed_tokens.weight · BF16 · 201,088×2880
embedding normsmedian 94.2097 · mean 94.4033
lineage checkno claimed base model
Battery runs (4)the run trace behind the findings — what each job measured
batterystatusqueueddurationattempts
gpucomplete2026-08-22 04:1680s1
weightscomplete2026-08-20 18:0228s1
weightscomplete2026-08-20 08:1026s1
weightscomplete2026-08-20 06:3538s1
gpu run 2026-08-22 — measurements
probes runglitch

Verdict badge

Ship the verdict in your README — it always shows the latest published analysis:

Ingot verdict: pass

[![Ingot scan](https://ingot.tools/api/v1/models/openai/gpt-oss-120b/badge.svg)](https://ingot.tools/models/openai/gpt-oss-120b)
Gate it in CI