Model page

VikramPal/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.3-text2sql-bf16 warn

downloads 342likes 0license otherarch mistralparams 7248.0Mupdated 2026-08-15

claims base: mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 · chat template: present · view on Hugging Face ↗

Scan coverage

Ingot runs three batteries against a model. What each one checks →

BatteryLooks atStatus
Static batteryMetadata & packagingcomplete 2026-08-21
Weights batteryWeights forensics — no GPU, no downloadcomplete 2026-08-2132,768-token embedding scanned · 194 undertrained · lineage consistent
Behavioral batteryLive-inference differentialsnot run

Findings

Scanned 2026-08-21 · published from a community scan.

medium License differs from claimed parent (other vs apache-2.0)

This model declares other while its claimed base mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 declares apache-2.0. Verify the re-license is permitted before commercial use.

How to fix

Verify the re-license is actually permitted before relying on it.

  1. Read the parent's license for derivative-work and re-licensing terms — many open-weight licenses (e.g. Llama-family) do not permit arbitrary re-licensing.
  2. If the re-license is not permitted, the parent's terms govern your use regardless of what this repo declares.

medium Chat template dropped vs parent

mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 ships a chat template; this repo does not. Serving stacks will silently fall back to a generic template, changing behavior. (In our 296-model census, 78% of pure quantization re-releases changed or dropped the template.)

How to fixingot patch

Restore the parent's chat template in `tokenizer_config.json` — a pure metadata fix.

  1. Run `ingot patch <owner/model>` — the patch manifest carries the parent's template and applies it to a local copy's `tokenizer_config.json`.
  2. Or fix by hand: copy the `chat_template` value from the parent repo's `tokenizer_config.json` into this model's, and pin your serving stack to that file.
  3. If the drift was intentional (the author retrained on a new template), confirm that in the model card before "fixing" it — restoring the parent template on retrained weights changes behavior too.

medium Undertrained (glitch) token surface in vocabulary

Embedding-norm scan flagged 194 undertrained tokens (norm < 0.3× the vocabulary median of 0.174), including 10 plain-ASCII strings that can appear in ordinary input as identifiers — e.g. "<0xFB>", "<0xFD>", "<0xFF>", "<0xFA>", "<0xFC>", "<0xFE>", "iNdEx", "febbra". In models where this class was tested behaviorally, such tokens silently rewrote user input into confident, schema-valid, wrong output. These are candidates from the weights alone; behavioral confirmation requires the behavioral battery.

How to fixruntime guardweight-level

Keep the affected token strings out of the model's input — the scan-derived runtime guard carries this model's exact blocklist.

  1. Fetch this model's guard artifact (`/api/v1/guard/<owner>/<model>`): the confirmed corrupting tokens and the low-norm candidate list, derived from the published scan.
  2. Screen inbound text with it (the `@ingotai/guard` package is a reference implementation) and route flagged records to a different model or human review — verbatim-copy tasks on flagged strings are the failure mode.
  3. The underlying cause is undertrained embeddings in the weights; a true fix is weight-level (continued pretraining on the affected tokens) — that is not a patch, it's a training job.

info Weights consistent with claimed parent mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3

Mean cosine similarity of 64 sampled token-embedding rows against mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 is 1.000 — the weights plausibly descend from the declared base (relation: unspecified).

How to fix

Fix or verify the `base_model` declaration so lineage checks can run.

  1. If you own the repo: correct the `base_model` field in the model card metadata to the real, public parent.
  2. If you don't: identify the true parent (config architecture + weight shapes narrow it fast) and re-scan with that lineage in mind.

Remediation guidance addresses the documented findings only. It is evidence-driven repair, not a safety certification of the model.

Fingerprint

The durable profile of this model: measured weights-and-metadata facts, rebuilt on every scan and battery run. Updated 2026-08-21.

architecturemistral · 32 layers · 4096-dim
parameters7248.0M
vocabulary32,768 tokens
licenseother
serializationsafetensors
chat templatenone
claimed lineagemistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
lineage verifiedconsistent vs mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 — embedding-row cosine 1.000
glitch-token surface194 undertrained candidates, 10 plain-ASCII
Full measured fingerprint
architecturesMistralForCausalLM
librarytransformers
pipelinetext-generation
repo files8
revision621dbda73d7d
HF snapshot340 downloads · 0 likes · updated 2026-08-15 · captured 2026-08-21
embedding tensormodel.embed_tokens.weight · BF16 · 32,768×4096
embedding normsmedian 0.1741 · mean 0.1678
lineage checkconsistent — cosine 1 over 64 sampled rows vs mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3
glitch-token samples"<0xFB>", "<0xFD>", "<0xFF>", "<0xFA>", "<0xFC>", "<0xFE>", "iNdEx", "febbra", "NdEx", "uitgen"

Battery runs

The run trace behind the findings above: every deep-battery job for this model, with what each run measured or why it failed. Findings are only as good as the runs that produced them.

batterystatusqueueddurationattempts
weightscomplete2026-08-21 05:1563s1
weights run 2026-08-21 measurements
probes runglitch-norm-scan, lineage-norm-correlation
embedding tensormodel.embed_tokens.weight · BF16 · 32,768×4096
glitch surface194 undertrained, 10 plain-ASCII
lineage checkconsistent — cosine 1 over 64 rows vs mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3

Fix it

Some findings are metadata-level and patchable — apply the fixes to your local copy (your weights never leave your machine):

npx @ingotai/scan patch VikramPal/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.3-text2sql-bf16

Remediation guidance addresses the documented findings only. It is evidence-driven repair, not a safety certification of the model.

Verdict badge

Ship the verdict in your README — it always shows the latest published analysis:

Ingot verdict: warn

[![Ingot scan](https://ingot.tools/api/v1/models/VikramPal/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.3-text2sql-bf16/badge.svg)](https://ingot.tools/models/VikramPal/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.3-text2sql-bf16)
Gate it in CI