Model page

HuggingFaceTB/SmolVLM-256M-Instruct warn

The chat template differs from its base model, which changes behavior; its tokenizer differs from its claimed base model.

downloads 412.1klikes 418license apache-2.0arch idefics3params 256.5Mupdated 2025-04-08

claims base: HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct, google/siglip-base-patch16-512 · chat template: present · view on Hugging Face ↗

Scan coverageStatic battery2026-08-22Weights battery2026-08-22Behavioral batterynot rundetails
BatteryLooks atStatus
Static batteryMetadata & packagingcomplete 2026-08-22
Weights batteryWeights forensics: no GPU, no downloadcomplete 2026-08-2249,280-token embedding scanned · 0 undertrained · lineage consistent
Behavioral batteryLive-inference differentialsnot run

Ingot runs three batteries against a model. What each one checks →

Findings

Scanned 2026-08-22 · published from a community scan.

medium Chat template differs from claimed parent

The chat template does not match HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct's. Template drift silently changes model behavior even when weights are identical — 37% of drifted derivatives in our census left it undisclosed. Diff the templates before deploying.

How to fixingot patch

Restore the parent's chat template in `tokenizer_config.json` — a pure metadata fix.

  1. Run `ingot patch <owner/model>` — the patch manifest carries the parent's template and applies it to a local copy's `tokenizer_config.json`.
  2. Or fix by hand: copy the `chat_template` value from the parent repo's `tokenizer_config.json` into this model's, and pin your serving stack to that file.
  3. If the drift was intentional (the author retrained on a new template), confirm that in the model card before "fixing" it — restoring the parent template on retrained weights changes behavior too.

medium Vocabulary size differs from claimed parent (49280 vs 49152)

A changed vocab means changed tokenization: strings will split differently than on HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct, which can shift behavior on identifiers, codes, and non-English text.

How to fixweight-level

Not patchable: the vocab size mirrors the embedding matrix in the weights. Verify the change was intentional.

  1. Do not edit `vocab_size` in config.json to "match the parent" — it must equal the embedding table in the shipped weights or the model won't load.
  2. Diff the tokenizers (`tokenizer.json` / added_tokens) against the parent to see what was added or removed, and test your own identifiers, codes, and non-English text through both.
  3. If the drift is unexplained by the model card, treat tokenization-sensitive behavior as unvalidated on this model.

info Embedding-norm glitch scan clean

No undertrained tokens found: every non-special token's embedding norm is above 0.3× the vocabulary median (3.058). The glitch-token data-corruption class has no candidate surface in this model.

info Weights consistent with claimed parent HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct

Mean cosine similarity of 64 sampled token-embedding rows against HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct is 0.997 — the weights plausibly descend from the declared base (relation: unspecified).

Put this result in your workflow

Check every checkpoint before it ships

Use the web app, API, CLI, or CI gate to scan candidate checkpoints and catch model drift before deployment. Public-model scans publish to the open database; paid plans add the volume needed for continuous checks.

Fix it

Some findings are metadata-level and patchable — apply the fixes to your local copy (your weights never leave your machine):

npx @ingotai/scan patch HuggingFaceTB/SmolVLM-256M-Instruct

Remediation guidance addresses the documented findings only. It is evidence-driven repair, not a safety certification of the model.

Fingerprint

The durable profile of this model: measured weights-and-metadata facts, rebuilt on every scan and battery run. Updated 2026-08-22.

architectureidefics3
parameters256.5M
vocabulary49,280 tokens
licenseapache-2.0
serializationsafetensors
chat templatepresent · sha256:830005085ddd94ce
claimed lineageHuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct, google/siglip-base-patch16-512
lineage verifiedconsistent vs HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct — embedding-row cosine 0.997
glitch-token surfaceclean no undertrained tokens
Full measured fingerprint
architecturesIdefics3ForConditionalGeneration
librarytransformers
pipelineimage-text-to-text
repo files38
revision7e3e67edbbed
HF snapshot871.6k downloads · 398 likes · updated 2025-04-08 · captured 2026-08-21
embedding tensormodel.text_model.embed_tokens.weight · BF16 · 49,280×576
embedding normsmedian 3.058 · mean 3.1033
lineage checkconsistent — cosine 0.9971 over 64 sampled rows vs HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct
Battery runs (1)the run trace behind the findings — what each job measured
batterystatusqueueddurationattempts
weightscomplete2026-08-21 07:4320s1
weights run 2026-08-21 — measurements
probes runglitch-norm-scan, lineage-norm-correlation
embedding tensormodel.text_model.embed_tokens.weight · BF16 · 49,280×576
glitch surface0 undertrained, 0 plain-ASCII
lineage checkconsistent — cosine 0.9971 over 64 rows vs HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct

Verdict badge

Ship the verdict in your README — it always shows the latest published analysis:

Ingot verdict: warn

[![Ingot scan](https://ingot.tools/api/v1/models/HuggingFaceTB/SmolVLM-256M-Instruct/badge.svg)](https://ingot.tools/models/HuggingFaceTB/SmolVLM-256M-Instruct)
Gate it in CI